| Reply To Message: |
| Posted By |
n/a on 5/17/2008 2:06:55 AM |
| Subject: |
RE: Promotion of "September Clues" and the No Planes Theory is irresponsible |
| Message: |
There is no science let alone 'real' video footage from 911 to support the official story that 4 COMMERCIAL aircraft were used on 911. I did see 'September Clues' and the counter version called 'September Clues Busted.' I would definitely side with the former as Lawson's version defied science and logic. I wonder who he is working for, or maybe he has a huge ego full of manure. Lawson accuses the SC author of video fakery. I would say that Lawson has at least 2 shots that are forged (inserted objects), and uses them as proof of COMMERCIAL planes. This topic can be discussed for hours so I will just describe a few items that tell me as a former aerospace engineer that Lawson is lying to the public.
1. No COMMERCIAL aircraft will stay intact through these WTC towers and go out the other end. It is IMPOSSIBLE. Even at the quoted official 30,000 foot cruising speed of over 500 mph. The nose is especially fragile as it is encased in a type of plastic to house the sensitive navigational and sensor equipment. The less metal the better. Even a COMMERCIAL aircraft skin is about 0.1 inches thick. A COMMERCIAL aircraft would crumple, vaporize and/or fall into pieces as soon as it met the 3-13 inch thick steel columns. Steel always wins over aluminum. Image firing a solid aluminum (if it somehow did not vaporize out of the barrel) bullet into even an equally thick plate of steel. Now image the reverse...steel bullet into a plate of aluminum...easy right?
2. There was not 8 legitimate Boeing engines found during 911. Every and I mean every aircraft accident will recover major fragments of a jet engine. Here we are talking about 8! and nothing found. Yes there were supposedly 2 that were really plants that appeared as Boing 757 and 767 engines...for another discussion. |
|