Login Register
   
Comment and Opinions
Subject: Exactly Like the JFK Inquiry
Prev Next

Author Messages
harryfreeloader (guest)

05/13/2008 9:15 AM Quote Reply  

People looking at hard evidence and asking witnesses what they saw and heard under oath in the JFK investigations, have been regarded as “kooks” and “scavengers” because of the “nut” element that always seems to surface in anything controversal. JFK was killed by his limo driver, Jackie shot him because he was a womanizer, the Russians, no, the Cubans, no, the Mob, no, the Martians got him.

There’s another thing that has to be considered—media assets of the government publishing disinformation to discredit honest inquiry—like Vincent Bugliosi, Priscilla Johnson, Peter Jennings, Walter Cronkite, Dan Rather, et al. The government is going to continue to hide the true facts of 9/11 just like they continue to hide the facts about the coup d état that took place in Dallas. The government can’t afford to let the American public or the world know how corrupt they are because, like Hitler, the world, and even its own citizens, would rise up against them. 

 

 

Dickinseattle (guest)

05/20/2008 5:07 PM Quote Reply  
All good points. Some of the nut elements responding to our various Rightwing (CIA/FBI) conspiracies are deliberate and meant to discredit the truth movement. Remember the CIA memo on how to use it's media assets to defend the Warren commission, and Beernsteins outing of the Church committee findings in Rolling Stone 10/78.


Quick Reply
Username:  
Subject:  
Body:
 



ActiveForums 3.7
Print  Minimize

You are not currently registered or logged in to the 9/11 Truth Seattle Community Web Portal

Click here to Register or Login