Ben Collette, the current organizer of the 911TruthSeattle.org Group and the ower of the domain name has worked hard to gain a visible local cable TV presence for the 9/11 Truth Community.  He is now decided to show videos that supports the No Planes theory.  Ben is well aware that others in our group do not agree with or support this theory but since he is control of the programing he has decided that it is he that chooses what is good to share. 

This is wrong. Even if Ben can get a majority of the only 10-12 people in Seattle willing to come to the meeting to raise their hands doesn't qualify him as a good Public Relations agent for the movement as a whole.  

KISS -- Keep It Simple, Sam

What is the core set onto which a consensus can be built? Please permit me to get it started.

1) Explosions brought down the three towers.

     A. It doesn't matter whether or not any planes hit WTC1 and WTC2 -- it was explosions that brought down all three buildings.

     B. It doesn't matter what kind of explosives were used.

     C. It doesn't matter whether or not a missile was fired into WTC2 for "shock and awe" effect.

2. ...

What I'm getting at is to avoid the minutia. Stick with a limited set of items that can be proved, and on which all sincere 9/11 truthers can agree.

Assume that there will be government agents who will try to tear a group apart. Accept that some folks are jerks, whose only interest in the 9/11 truth movement is ego inflation.

 First of all let's get my name right, it's Ben Collet, not Collette.  Secondly, I'm not a mossad, cia or any other kind of government agent.  I'm simply someone who wants to know the truth about what happened on 9-11, and I see nothing to be gained, and a great deal to be lost, by curbing free investigation at this point.

 Mike apparently thinks that not only does he know what did or did not happen, but that he should be the one to decide what areas of inquiry are permissable and which ones are not.  I realize this mistaken faith in censorship is also shared by the national leadership of 911Truth.org, as well as the majority of truthers, but that does not make it correct.  In fact it is profoundly misguided.

 I and those of us who support free inquiry, and who also find the research of Judy Wood and the no-planers to be valuable, have actively initiated and supported appearances by a good number of researchers here, even if they weren't no-planers.  We would like the same consideration given to us.

 There are a number of other  important points to be made on this subject, but let's first see if Mike is going to allow comments critical of his actions.

 First of all let's get my name right, it's Ben Collet, not Collette.  Secondly, I'm not a mossad, cia or any other kind of government agent.  I'm simply someone who wants to know the truth about what happened on 9-11, and I see nothing to be gained, and a great deal to be lost, by curbing free investigation at this point.

 Mike apparently thinks that not only does he know what did or did not happen, but that he should be the one to decide what areas of inquiry are permissable and which ones are not.  I realize this mistaken faith in censorship is also shared by the national leadership of 911Truth.org, as well as the majority of truthers, but that does not make it correct.  In fact it is profoundly misguided.

 I and those of us who support free inquiry, and who also find the research of Judy Wood and the no-planers to be valuable, have actively initiated and supported appearances by a good number of researchers here, even if they weren't no-planers.  We would like the same consideration given to us.

 There are a number of other  important points to be made on this subject, but let's first see if Mike is going to allow comments critical of his actions.

 First of all let's get my name right, it's Ben Collet, not Collette.  Secondly, I'm not a mossad, cia or any other kind of government agent.  I'm simply someone who wants to know the truth about what happened on 9-11, and I see nothing to be gained, and a great deal to be lost, by curbing free investigation at this point.

 Mike apparently thinks that not only does he know what did or did not happen, but that he should be the one to decide what areas of inquiry are permissable and which ones are not.  I realize this mistaken faith in censorship is also shared by the national leadership of 911Truth.org, as well as the majority of truthers, but that does not make it correct.  In fact it is profoundly misguided.

 I and those of us who support free inquiry, and who also find the research of Judy Wood and the no-planers to be valuable, have actively initiated and supported appearances by a good number of researchers here, even if they weren't no-planers.  We would like the same consideration given to us.

 There are a number of other  important points to be made on this subject, but let's first see if Mike is going to allow comments critical of his actions.

 First of all let's get my name right, it's Ben Collet, not Collette.  Secondly, I'm not a mossad, cia or any other kind of government agent.  I'm simply someone who wants to know the truth about what happened on 9-11, and I see nothing to be gained, and a great deal to be lost, by curbing free investigation at this point.

 Mike apparently thinks that not only does he know what did or did not happen, but that he should be the one to decide what areas of inquiry are permissable and which ones are not.  I realize this mistaken faith in censorship is also shared by the national leadership of 911Truth.org, as well as the majority of truthers, but that does not make it correct.  In fact it is profoundly misguided.

 I and those of us who support free inquiry, and who also find the research of Judy Wood and the no-planers to be valuable, have actively initiated and supported appearances by a good number of researchers here, even if they weren't no-planers.  We would like the same consideration given to us.

 There are a number of other  important points to be made on this subject, but let's first see if Mike is going to allow comments critical of his actions.

Ben I apologize for mispelling your name. It was not intentional and no disrespect was intended.

Now as for your statement ...

Mike apparently thinks that not only does he know what did or did not happen, but that he should be the one to decide what areas of inquiry are permissable and which ones are not.  I realize this mistaken faith in censorship is also shared by the national leadership of 911Truth.org, as well as the majority of truthers, but that does not make it correct.  In fact it is profoundly misguided.

For the record, I don't think that I know what did or didn't happen.  I think of the volumes of information available prove to me that the official story is a lie.  I will admit that the evidence, testimony and hypothesis' that is promoted by the "National Leadership of 911Truth.org, as well as the majority of thruthers"  sound the most credible and persuasive.  Since I want a new investigation it makes since to use the most credible and presuasive information when promoting public events.

As for me thinking that I "should be the one to decide what areas of inquire are permisable and which ones are not"...  this is bullshit.  Everyone should inquire into whatever they want.  In fact the "MAJORITY OF TRUTHERS" have inquired into both the No-Plane and Energy-Beam weapons and we are not buying it!  In fact we all agree that it is damaging to the work of everyone else is doing trying to convince citizens that have not yet come into contact with the Truth Issues. 

Anyone who steps up to share information with the public in order to change our government take on a larger responsibility.  Ben, you, decided that you should PUBLICLY PROMOTE theories that the "MAJORITY OF TRUTHERS" find are unbelievable.

I am saying that I will not support in any way that PUBLIC PROMOTION.

Ben uses the dreaded "Censorship" word in his attack on me.  This is a common ploy for anyone who wants to gain support for those who feel disenfranchised.  "Don't let the MAN shut you up!"  I am not censoring Ben or the No-Planers.  I simply refuse to support the public promotion of theories that the MAJORITY OF TRUTHERS think are harmful.

It is Ben and the 5 people who showed up at the last meeting and voted to promote Judy Wood under the banner of "911TruthSeattle.org" that think they know better than the MAJORITY OF TRUTHERS what is best. 

Then Ben, without any meeting to discuss it, posted an advertisement on the front page of the website that we was going to show "September Clues"  the ultimate No-Planers video.

Who is it that thinks they should control the direction of Public Information and Activism?

What happens when new people go to these websites and find that they viciously attach the information and motives of THE MAJORITY OF TRUTHERS?

Inclosing, I am aware that Ben has been kicked of most of the 9/11 Truth forums because he is an arguer.  There is a saying:  "Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty, and the pig likes it"  I don't plan on wasting more time on him.