Ben I apologize for mispelling your name. It was not intentional and no disrespect was intended.

Now as for your statement ...

Mike apparently thinks that not only does he know what did or did not happen, but that he should be the one to decide what areas of inquiry are permissable and which ones are not.  I realize this mistaken faith in censorship is also shared by the national leadership of 911Truth.org, as well as the majority of truthers, but that does not make it correct.  In fact it is profoundly misguided.

For the record, I don't think that I know what did or didn't happen.  I think of the volumes of information available prove to me that the official story is a lie.  I will admit that the evidence, testimony and hypothesis' that is promoted by the "National Leadership of 911Truth.org, as well as the majority of thruthers"  sound the most credible and persuasive.  Since I want a new investigation it makes since to use the most credible and presuasive information when promoting public events.

As for me thinking that I "should be the one to decide what areas of inquire are permisable and which ones are not"...  this is bullshit.  Everyone should inquire into whatever they want.  In fact the "MAJORITY OF TRUTHERS" have inquired into both the No-Plane and Energy-Beam weapons and we are not buying it!  In fact we all agree that it is damaging to the work of everyone else is doing trying to convince citizens that have not yet come into contact with the Truth Issues. 

Anyone who steps up to share information with the public in order to change our government take on a larger responsibility.  Ben, you, decided that you should PUBLICLY PROMOTE theories that the "MAJORITY OF TRUTHERS" find are unbelievable.

I am saying that I will not support in any way that PUBLIC PROMOTION.

Ben uses the dreaded "Censorship" word in his attack on me.  This is a common ploy for anyone who wants to gain support for those who feel disenfranchised.  "Don't let the MAN shut you up!"  I am not censoring Ben or the No-Planers.  I simply refuse to support the public promotion of theories that the MAJORITY OF TRUTHERS think are harmful.

It is Ben and the 5 people who showed up at the last meeting and voted to promote Judy Wood under the banner of "911TruthSeattle.org" that think they know better than the MAJORITY OF TRUTHERS what is best. 

Then Ben, without any meeting to discuss it, posted an advertisement on the front page of the website that we was going to show "September Clues"  the ultimate No-Planers video.

Who is it that thinks they should control the direction of Public Information and Activism?

What happens when new people go to these websites and find that they viciously attach the information and motives of THE MAJORITY OF TRUTHERS?

Inclosing, I am aware that Ben has been kicked of most of the 9/11 Truth forums because he is an arguer.  There is a saying:  "Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty, and the pig likes it"  I don't plan on wasting more time on him.