I believe that there are two ways to view the 9/11 Truth Seattle group. 

• It is a study group where people can go to learn more about the controversies surrounding 9/11 and discuss them with other.
• It is a citizen activist group working together to promote a new, open and complete investigation.

While it can certainly be both,  it takes on a tremendous responsibility when it starts promoting researchers, books, videos and theories to the general public with the supposed goal to promote the need for a new investigation.   No one should be brought just to give them a chance to talk or because it "might be interesting"  if if could add fuel to the "tin hat" image that we are always struggling to overcome.

I believe that the decision to bring Judy Wood and John Hutchinson under duel sponsership of the "Seattle Metaphysical Library" and "9/11TruthSeattle.org" is the wrong type of event to introduce the 9/11 Truth to our local citizens.  

This does not promote truth.  It promotes irresponsible speculation.

Mike Hagar

Have you been frustrated that mainstream media have ignored 9/11 truth movement?

The mainstream media will likely engage fully this "tin hat" image--and who do we have to thank for taking three steps backward?  You know who you are.

I'm in full agreement and support Mike Hagar's decision to close this website until rationality and a keen sense of "what plays in Peoria" is restored to the Seattle "tin hat truthers".

This is in no way meant to say that there is no proof of exotic phenomena--or that there is no need to explore such phenomena.  This is to say that we (truthers) who have worked so hard to establish public credibility have so much we can hang out hat on--that to promote fringe ideas to the public is wreckless and unthinking about how our movement will be cast.

Is it possible that 9/11 Seattle is now infiltrated by disinformation specialists?  Is Nico Haupt one of the influential leaders in the background of 9/11 Seattle?

Let's get back to basics.  WTC7, thermate, nano-thermite, iron spherules, freefall rate collapse, Flight 93 shot down, $2.3 trillion in Pentagon allocations missing, "pull it", confiscated videotapes, Philip Zelikow conflicts of interest, Bush Saw First Plane, and for those public who need baby steps to confront the awful realizations about 9/11:  Oklahoma City Bombing Rare Footage (YouTube).

Space weapons may have been employed.  However, the evidence we have that is much more solid and credible should be our focus. 

Thanks Mike Hager for taking this stand.

Dr. Ed Kendrick

Kansas City

It's unfortunate that many refuse to understand that Directed Energy Weapons and No Planes is what actually happened on 9/11. It is not speculation, it is fact, and is admissible in a Court of Law, which is where it is headed.

It's unfortunate that many refuse to understand that Directed Energy Weapons and No Planes is what actually happened on 9/11. It is not speculation, it is fact, and is admissible in a Court of Law, which is where it is headed.

Dr. Judy Wood has the most data-filled website of any 9/11 truth researcher.

Her credentials are unimpeachable and her conclusions are solid.

There were no planes hijacked on 9/11, and beam weapons were used

to destroy the WTC.  If you want to find our the trruth about 9/11, it starts

with realizing that they tricked us with the images of a plane flying into

a building to hide the real beam weapon that destroyed the twin towers.

Dr. Judy Wood has the most data-filled website of any 9/11 truth researcher.

Her credentials are unimpeachable and her conclusions are solid.

There were no planes hijacked on 9/11, and beam weapons were used

to destroy the WTC.  If you want to find our the trruth about 9/11, it starts

with realizing that they tricked us with the images of a plane flying into

a building to hide the real beam weapon that destroyed the twin towers.