Greetings to all:

The key questions for a new 9/11 Investigation must be asked from a perspective of the facts told by the evidence VERSUS the inconsistencies in the Official Bush Administration Cover Story for each case.  While I am proud to be selected to join www.ae911truth.org/ for my General Contractor and Demolition Supervisor experience, my acceptance letter included objections to the Board’s solitary focus on “Re-examining the 3 WTC high-rise collapses” as a first priority.  While our expert architects work with skilled engineers to put out their “A” (architectural) and “S” (engineering) blueprints, the General Contractor works with a third set of ‘steel drawings’ from the steel manufacturer and informs these experts on how their building will be erected in the real world. The General Contractor coordinates the efforts of all his subcontractors including the excavators, layout crews, footer crews who place the large anchor bolts supporting the structural steel, masons who connect their walls to these steel supports and form carpenters who form and pour their beams and tie all of the masonry together. The point is that Americans and the world population in general require an intermediary level of trained and experienced contractors of all kinds for even the simplest of their blueprints to become a reality.

We The People are represented by a wide spectrum of individuals with many more uneducated worker-types on the bottom and a few well educated sophisticated-types in possession of a great wealth of 9/11 knowledge.  Helping our brothers and sisters come to ‘the truth’ about the real 9/11 Insider Terrorists begins with the most obvious and ‘easy to see’ facets to THEN go more deeply into the complicated geometric and statistical exercises.  We should begin with the evidence involving the Flight 93 and Flight 77 cases in that order, while introducing the architectural and engineering postulates along the way.  We should use visual aids throughout the process and work from the simplest examples to the more complicated, as we educate the wide spectrum of readers, so they can draw sound conclusions based upon the facts in each case.  Therefore, the first series of questions should pertain to the Flight 93 case, which has the fewest number of variables.

1.  Donald Rumsfeld must be ordered to offer clarifying statements to his Flight 93 “Shot Down” statements:

Source >>  edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0412/24/nfcnn.01.html

DONALD RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE: And to change that way of living, would strike at the very essence of our country.

And I think all of us have a sense if we imagine the kind of world we would face if the people who bombed the mess hall in Mosul, or the people who did the bombing in Spain, or the people who attacked the United States in New York, shot down the plane over Pennsylvania and attacked the Pentagon, the people who cut off peoples' heads on television to intimidate, to frighten -- indeed the word "terrorized" is just that. Its purpose is to terrorize, to alter behavior, to make people be something other than that which they want to be.     

2.  Wallace Miller is the Somerset County Coroner (www.post-gazette.com/nation/20020911miller0911P9.asp) responsible for filling out the official reports.  Miller is quoted as saying (www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20011015newsmaker1015p2.asp) ,

 "It was as if the plane had stopped and let the passengers off before it crashed," Miller said.

The new 9/11 Investigators need to grill the coroner on the precise evidence he released to the Federal Authorities along with the field operatives . . .



. . .  doing the ‘hands on’ investigation.  We want all of the pictures taken on 9/11 part of his official and unofficial investigation into this crime.

3.  All of the government officials forwarding the Bush Administration Cover Story must be forced to look at the photographic evidence (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_93)  . . .

. . . and explain the presence of an empty hole . . .

  . . . with unburned grass still growing clear to the bottom.  We want to see the look on their faces explaining how anything but ‘planted evidence’ . . .

. . . could possibly be found under this growing grass. 

4.  We want questions answered on the location of where the Flight 93 Jetliner debris was reassembled part of the official investigation. There is no such evidence, because no Jetliner ever crashed in this empty field, so the range of answers will prove very amusing indeed. 

5.  We want access to their planted evidence with Boeing and Rolls Royce representatives on hand to verify these are authentic components of Flight 93.

6.  Vice-president Cheney must give testimony concerning his role in the five anti-terror exercises (www.cassiopaea.org/cass/boeing.htm = bottom of page) under his direct command on 9/11, which included up to 22 Jetliners with some being remotely radio-controlled.

7. We want to question President Bush on why he was hiding down in Florida on 9/11, when his vice-president was in charge of such an important series of military and non-military exercises.  Other questions for Bush include:

8.  Where were our fighter jets?

9.  Where are all the flight recorders?

10. Why the lack of Jetliner Debris for Flight 93?

11. Why did he leave Barksdale Air Force Base to land in Nebraska at 1:48 PM on September 11 to return to
Washington at 4:30 PM? Who did he meet? Where are the White House reports on these meetings?

12.  Can he explain why Air Traffic Controllers did report a F-16 circling Flight 93 in visual range at the time of the crash?
 
13. How could the Bearded Jihadist Radicals disable our national defense systems?

14. What is the source of the pictures identifying the 19 hijackers?

15. How did the Bush Administration identify all the hijackers in only two days?

These questions to our top government officials in charge on 9/11 will uncover the paper trail and another series of questions to finally get to the bottom of this Government “Inside Job” Conspiracy.  We begin with the Flight 93 case, because of the wide gapping gash between the ‘evidence’ (empty hole = www.letsroll911.org/phpwebsite/files/documents/Day_1_-_Pittsburg_Crash_01.swf) told by the facts and the obvious lies from the Bush Administration.  The architectural and engineering slant is supported by comparing the structural integrity of the massive Boeing 757-200 Jetliner against the miniscule amount of evidence on display at the scene.  Newton’s Laws of Mechanics (www.egothemag.com/archives/2005/11/mathematical_la.htm) were all working before, during and after the 9/11 attacks, which means the Government is short about 100-Tons of Flight 93 evidence. 

The Flight 77 case is much more involved, because we have the 100-Ton Jetliner crashing into a solid architectural structure.  This gives our Cover Story Operatives an opportunity to play their games of manipulating many more variables to their own devious predetermined conclusion. 



The obvious flaw in the Official Bush Administration Cover story is that the Pentagon has already been attacked and the West Wedge Wall is still standing with no room for their 125-foot wide 100-Ton Jetliner.  A 100-Ton object going 500 miles per hour creates enough Newtons to send portions of this masonry wall to the center of the Pentagon and back again.  This represents a great opportunity for our architects and engineers to educate their readers on the dynamics of solid 6-ton Rolls Royce Engines penetrating masonry walls at 500 miles per hour, but no impact holes appearing some 50 feet apart on the Pentagon façade.  Key questions about this case include:

1.  The Twin Towers were attacked earlier that morning, so why no military jets to protect the Pentagon?

2.  Where are all the pictures of Flight 77 approaching and crashing into the Pentagon? 

3.  The Pentagon is protected by “five extremely sophisticated anti-missile batteries” (www.cassiopaea.org/cass/boeing.htm). Who gave the command to turn the Pentagon Defense System off?

4. Why was the temporary morgue set up at Dover (www.usmedicine.com/article.cfm) by Donald Rumsfeld and not at the Pentagon?

5.   We need clarifying statements on Donald Rumsfeld’s “missile” statements to Parade Magazine on 9/12 (www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/Missile-Not-Flight-77.html).

6.  CNN Chief Pentagon Correspondent Jamie McIntire gave this original “No Plane” Report (www.youtube.com/watch), to then reverse himself with claims of taking pictures of Flight 77 fuselage inside the Pentagon. We want his clarifying statements and full disclosure of those fantasy pictures. 

7.  These DoD operatives are handling Flight 77 evidence (911research.wtc7.net/talks/pent1/coverup.html), which represents the corruption of any crime scene evidence part of this criminal investigation. Who are these men and who ordered them to run around corrupting the crime scene evidence?  My contention is they are not picking up evidence at all, but putting their planted evidence down. That is why everything on the lawn can be picked up and carried in your hand. 

8.  Where is all the evidence from the video security cameras in perfect position to catch everything?

911research.wtc7.net/talks/pent1/vacuum.html

The FBI moved in to confiscate all the video surveillance data from the surrounding area and none of that has been released to We The People.

9. How does a 125-foot wide almost 50-foot tall 100-ton Jetliner crash into a masonry wall and leave a 20-foot diameter impact hole?

10.  The Official Pentagon Frames (911research.wtc7.net/talks/pent1/video.html) show a low flying white object entering Frame1:



The security camera, the top of the right hand column, the nose of the flying object and a point just above the horizon are all on the same level 5-foot elevation transit plane.  Since the distance below the object is three times ‘greater’ than the diameter, then this object cannot possibly be greater than just under 2 feet.

This schematic shows all four points on the same 5-foot elevation plane and damage very much like that of a missile attack. If the diameter of this flying object equals that of a Boeing 757-200 Jetliner, and we have three times that distance underneath, then the object would have struck the Pentagon at the 52’-6” height above the ground.  However, the evidence shows only two windows missing on the second floor and a damaged concrete column still standing between them. We want Department of Defense answers to how their own video images show a flying object one tenth the diameter of Flight 77. 

11.  We want questions answered on the location of where the Flight 77 Jetliner debris was reassembled part of the official investigation. Again, the government has no such evidence, because no Jetliner ever crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11 or any other day. 

12.  Since the bodies received at Dover (www.usmedicine.com/article.cfm) did not come from the Pentagon, then we want to know location from where the military planes carried those remains.  

13. We want access to the Pentagon planted evidence with Boeing and Rolls Royce representatives on hand to verify these are authentic components of Flight 77. The evidence will reveal the planted engine rotors are from much smaller military jets and not even part of any Jetliner at all. 

14.  All of the military witnesses felt the missile shockwave and smelled cordite (911review.org/Wiki/PentagonAttackWitnessesBlast.shtml) on the scene at the Pentagon on 9/11. We want all of their testimony and Donald Rumsfeld questioned on the discrepancies between the Bush Administration Cover Story and the evidence. 

15.  We want questions answered by President Bush on Dick Cheney’s authority over the five ‘live-fly’ (www.cassiopaea.org/cass/boeing.htm = bottom of page) antiterrorism exercises carried out on 9/11 and how any of those dynamics played any role in the government decisions.

The World Trade Center cases are much to complex and complicated to even attempt a serious line of questioning, because of the many variables and so much information to cover. Therefore, our focus should be upon the single case of WTC-7 that was struck by nothing, but collapsed into its own footprint in just a few hours.  Since only three steel-framed skyscrapers have collapsed due to a supposed ‘fire’ in the history of this planet, and they all were owned by Larry “Pull It” Silverstein, then we can adequately assume they all collapsed for the same reasons.  After all, Dr. Steven Jones’ report (www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi) includes Termite residue in all three cases.  My very first question to the Bush Administration is:

1.  Where is your precedent for any steel-framed skyscraper collapsing into its own footprint due to ‘fire?’  Nothing like that has happened before or after 9/11, which raises the red flag to the top of the pole right off the bat.  The ‘bought and paid for’ Loyal Bushie cronies like Jim Meigs' (Popular Mechanics Cronie) and Abolhassan Astaneh (www.berkeley.edu/news/berkeleyan/2001/10/03_grou.html) should be hauled before Congress to give an accounting of their precedents for any steel-framed skyscraper collapsing ‘demolition-style’ from 1000-degree building fires. 

2.  How does the presence of Thermite (www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/240406thermiteidentified.htm) play a role in their ‘fire’ theory.

3.  Who cancelled the WTC security meeting for 9/11 on 9/10? 

4.  What was Rudy Giuliani’s role in “Tripod 2” the joint NYC / Department of Justice biowarfare exercise?  www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/060704_tripod_fema.html Michael Ruppert reports that then Mayor Giuliani diverted FEMA from setting up the emergency command center in his 23rd Floor WTC-7 Bunker, when they showed up on 9/10.  Giuliani pointed FEMA authorities away from WTC-7 to set up operations at Pier 29 on the day ‘before’ 9/11, which tipped his hand about having prior knowledge of these 9/11 attacks.  We want to know everything Giuliani knew and when he knew it.

5.  We want to know Ashcroft’s role in giving 91 illegal exit visa’s to the members of an elite Israeli demolition team (portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/05/339398.shtml) in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks.  We want to know when those people entered the USA, their movements during their time here and Ashcroft’s knowledge of their activities during that time. 

6.  Larry “Pull It” Silverstein gained possession of the Twin Towers in the summer of 2001 and instantly began over-insuring every component. His “Pull It” (vestigialconscience.com/PullIt.mp3) testimony, says,

"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.”   

We want to interview the fire department commander and verify his participation in this plan to ‘Pull It.’ We want to know the provisions of his plan and how those steps were taken to “Pull” WTC-7 down in such a short period.  The intimation by Mr. Silverstein is there was ‘no time’ to put out the small fires sectioned off in Compartmentalized Areas of the building. And yet, we are to understand he did have time to set the hundreds of charges required to ‘Pull It’ by severing all of the required columns, girders, beams and bar-joists. The point is that Mr. Silverstein was speaking to the crew chief of the Israeli-led demolition team who had been wiring all the WTC buildings in the weeks leading up to 9/11.   The Official FEMA Report says there were "no manual firefighting operations in Building 7" (www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20Government/911%20Cover-up/wtc7.htm), which sets up a series of contradictions in Silverstein's story.

7.  If the fire chief ‘made that decision to Pull,’ then what exactly did he ‘Pull’ to cause WTC-7 to collapse into its own footprint immediately after that decision was finalized? In other words, typical demolition jobs include a myriad of wires connected together and localized into a single detonation location. We want to know the details on how that plan was conceived, implemented and eventually carried out in a single day.

8.  WTC-7 had a functional fire alarm and sprinkling system.  How do the WTC officials explain neither functioning properly on 9/11? 

9.  Who gave John O’Neill the security job at the World Trade Center?  What was his involvement with FEMA authorities on 9/10? 

www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20Government/911%20Cover-up/john_oneill-murdered_on_911.htm  

Read about Presidential Directive W199i on that website.

10. The windows in WTC-7 are not even broken, but the building is collapsing at ‘free-fall’ velocity.

And yet, the massive steel columns are located just inside these windows.  How did all the 2800-degree column steel melt, but the windows show no sign of fire at all?

11.  What fuel source could possibly allow building fires to generate the minimum heat required to cause simultaneous catastrophic failure of ‘all’ WTC-7 columns and beams in just a few hours?

12.  The evidence shows 45-degree shaped-charge (www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc_charges.html) Termite cuts . . .

. . . in areas where no worker could even reach.  All of the so-called experts must be questioned on how this evidence proves the Official Government “Fire” Explanation. 

13.  Dr. Steven Jones’ paper (www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi) begins with “large quantities of molten metal were observed in basement areas under rubble piles of all three buildings.” These pools of molten iron were still burning six weeks later at 1500 degrees centigrade. Building fires are not capable of burning anywhere near that intensity (www.schwabcorp.com/faqs.htm#fire_safe), which points directly to Dr. Jones' controlled demolition thesis.  We want all of this data entered as evidence and the 9/11 Commission cronies to explain their negligence in even addressing WTC-7 in their report. 

14.  Everyone involved must be asked why the remains of WTC-7 were mysteriously removed from the scene without a thorough investigation (www.wtc7.net/noprobe.html).  Here we have the first three steel-framed skyscrapers to ever collapse due to fire in history and the remains are shipped off to be recycled at record pace. FEMA assembled the team of engineers together, but then refused them access to the crime scene.

15.  NORAD and the Joint-chiefs were working under Vice-president Cheney on 9/11 taking part in (www.cassiopaea.org/cass/boeing.htm):

1) Military Exercise, Northern Vigilance.
3) Wargame Exercise, Vigilant Guardian.
4) Wargame Exercise, Vigilant Warrior.
5) Wargame Exercise, Northern Guardian.

The only exercise they were not part of is “2) Non-military biowarfare Exercise Tripod 2” headed up by Rudy Giuliani, FEMA and Ashcroft’s Department of Justice.  We want testimony from everyone involved on how the decision making processes of that day were influenced by all of these exercises.

Gathering this information will reveal that many of our own government agencies were actively participating in the 9/11 terror attacks by simply following Presidential Orders and those of his subordinate authorities. While these lists can in no way represent a complete set of questions, they do represent a good starting point for Congress to begin gathering evidence part of a new 9/11 Investigation. 

Terral