Greetings to All:

This thread exposes ‘the truth’ that no 100-Ton Jetliner (Flight 77) ever crashed at the Pentagon on 9/11. You are encouraged to find us the picture of a crashed 100-Ton Jetliner anywhere near the Pentagon. Department of Defense Operatives planted plenty of evidence relating to this 9/11 HOAX, as the DoD carried out their own ‘self-inflicted’ wound on 9/11! Before anyone can haul out pictures of planted engines, they must show us how those things passed through the solid West Wedge Wall still intact after the original attack.  Everyone here should review all of the pictures from this website ( 911research.wtc7.net/talks/pent1/simulation.html ). Hit ‘<< Previous’ and ‘Next >>’ buttons, until your heart is content, but the only pictures of any 100-Ton Jetliner will be in the simulations. The most damning evidence to the Official Government Cover Story is revealed in these first two pictures:

911research.wtc7.net/talks/pent1/lawndamage.html



This picture shows a single impact hole in the West Wedge E-Ring Wall section of the Pentagon. However there are no impact holes for the multi-ton Rolls Royce engines some 50 feet apart. In fact, there is no place on the lawn or in the Pentagon wall for any crashed 100-Ton Jetliner.

911research.wtc7.net/talks/pent1/pentalawn.html



The fire has been extinguished for the first time, but the West Wedge Wall is still standing. Note the fire is still burning in two areas, but the firemen are dragging their hoses around like the job is done! Someone had to order these firemen away from the fire that you can still see burning in this picture. Look at the Pentagon lawn for any sign of Jetliner Debris to realize there is none! 

911research.wtc7.net/talks/pent1/spools.html



The Official Bush Administration Cover Story says kerosene (Jet fuel is only kerosene) vaporized an entire Jetliner, but did not even melt the black plastic on these cables. This picture shows the masonry components of the outer E-ring wall still standing, which eliminates the possibly of any 100-Ton Pig passing through here. 

911research.wtc7.net/talks/pent1/details.html



This schematic shows only seven feet between the tops of those cable spools and the bottom of the still intact second floor where only two windows are missing. Note the two windows to the left are not even broken, while the three damaged columns are bent back in our direction. The Official Pentagon Cover Story attempts to squeeze their 125-feet wide 100-Ton Jetliner into a space that simply cannot contain a Jetliner less than half this size.  The DoD released the video footage from two security cameras (911www.research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/videos/dodvideos.html ), from where this famous Frame1 image was taken:



Follow along and we will use this evidence to prove this contains the nose section of an object with the exact diameter of a Tomahawk Missile (www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-109.html#_SLCM = 20.9 inches).  Our first task is to identify that our camera lens, the top of the right hand column, the nose of the flying object and a point 5-feet above the horizon are all on the same level horizontal transit plane elevation. That means if we superimposed a flat sheet of glass 5 feet off the ground, then all four reference points would be touching along the same ‘line of vision’ from our perspective inside the camera lens.   We take the five-foot dimension from the center of our flying object and measure down to the ground to realize the ‘clearance’ under the object is 3 times greater than the diameter.  If the nose of the object is at 5-feet and the distance below that object is 3 to 4 feet, then the diameter of that flying object cannot possibly exceed 2 feet. These four reference points on the same level horizontal plane are demonstrated again here:

Cameras #1 and #2 are on the far left facing in the direction of the red 5-Foot Horizontal Elevation Plane to your right.  The top of our column is very near the two cameras, even though it appears in only one set of images.  The nose of the flying object is very low to the ground on this same 5-foot plane directly between the top of our 5-foot column and the horizon in the distance. If any of these reference points were higher or lower than our 5-foot elevation, then those points would not line up in the frame1 picture above.  We are perhaps lucky that the missile is approaching on the same elevation as the three reference points and lucky again that the nose was captured meeting the top of the column.  However, we are using these variables to our advantage, even though the laws of probability just happen to be on our side this time. :0). 

Since the diameter of a real 757-200 Jetliner is just about 15-feet, there is no way this frame1 object can possibly be anything near that size.  Remember our 3 to 1 ration of ‘clearance to object diameter' from the frame1 diagram above.  If the diameter of that flying object is 15 feet, then the clearance underneath is 3 times that number or a whopping 45 feet! Those calculations place the nose of the 100-Ton Jetliner at the “52-6” dimension  far up the wall on the right hand side of this diagram.  In other words, even the released Department of Defense pictures prove the Pentagon was struck by white flying object with the dimensions of a Tomahawk Missile, which is verified by the military witnesses in the Pentagon:

911review.org/Wiki/PentagonAttackWitnessesBlast.shtml

What I post here is only a few excerpts (read the site yourself):

In subsequent discussions on Gerard Holmgren's Flight77Witnesses article at indymedia.org, there is a further point of significant interest. A number of witnesses in the Pentagon Attack mention the smell of cordite (very different from the smell of kerosene) and a shockwave (very different from an impact and fire):

The airliner crashed between two and three hundred feet from my office in the Pentagon, just around a corner from where I work. ... I walked to my office, shut down my computer, and headed out. Even before stepping outside I could smell the cordite. Then I knew explosives had been set off somewhere. [WWW] McSweeney's

A personnel attorney at the Pentagon, Goldsmith was riding a shuttle bus to work on Tuesday, Sept. 11, when she learned of the attack on the world Trade Center. ... "We saw a huge black cloud of smoke," she said, saying it smelled like cordite or gun smoke. [WWW] Jewish Bulletin News

[WWW] Witnesses in the Pentagon, mostly military men, describe a shockwave and a blast; only explosives give a shockwave; there is no shockwave from a crash and fire:

Cordite + shockwave = Missile attack like Rumsfeld told Parade Magazine on 9/12 from the beginning:

www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/Missile-Not-Flight-77.html

Read the whole story from the link! These are only Rumsfeld’s words on this missile strike!

Rumsfeld To Parade Magazine on 9/12 >> Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filled with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center.

 
The Bush Administration lied about Weapons Of Mass Destruction in Iraq and they lied about Flight 93 crashing in the empty field outside of Shanksville (see my thread in this room) on 9/11. He is also lying about Flight 77 crashing here at the Pentagon, which is proven from the evidence.

GL,

Terral